Goa High Court Seeks Explanation Over Diversion Of Mining Fund To CM-Linked Nursing Institute

The High Court of Goa has sought clarification from the state government following allegations that Rs 3 crore from the mining fund, specifically designated for areas impacted by mining activities, was diverted to a nursing institute associated with Chief Minister Pramod Sawant in Sankhalim.

Acting on a petition filed by a non-governmental organisation (NGO), the court directed the state advocate general to submit an affidavit in response to the allegations.

The North Goa District Mineral Foundation, established to address environmental issues in regions affected by mineral mining, reportedly approved Rs 3 crore for a nursing college linked to Chief Minister Pramod Sawant in August. 

The Bombay High Court in Goa has initiated the inquiry based on the NGO's petition, which argues that the allocation deviates from the intended purpose of the mining fund, as outlined by statutory provisions.

The mining fund is meant to address the adverse effects of mining on local communities, allocating funds for crucial projects like clean drinking water, environmental protection, healthcare, and education.

Claude Alvares, the petitioner, raised concerns about the allocation, stating, "Several proposals were rejected, and only a grant was given to Sai Nursing Institute...Out of 143 proposals, 141 were rejected. 

The initial proposal was for Rs 18 crores, and later it was reduced to 3 crores. I don't understand how the district mineral foundation, headed by the district collector, passed the proposal. This incident is a prime contender for investigations under the Prevention of Corruption Act. This is where funds allocated for people affected due to mining business are going to the wrong hands."

In response, the Opposition is calling for a high-level investigation into the matter. Amit Palekar, leader of the Goa Aam Aadmi Party, labelled the issue a "serious corruption matter" that demands a thorough investigation. 

He highlighted the apparent inconsistency in the foundation's funding process, questioning why a private institute controlled by the Chief Minister received a grant while 141 out of 143 applications, including many from private individuals, were rejected. 

Palekar suggested that this apparent contradiction raises suspicions of unfair treatment and a potential conflict of interest.